Before I go further, I want to say that I don’t mean to be bashing anyone who feels differently about this issue than I do, and certainly anybody who has run an organization differently than I am about to suggest has my respect. It’s tough making things work. Just ask any bank, car manufacturer, record company. Heck, just about anybody these days. Getting a big donor can be a dream come true under the circumstances.
And hey, free money is free money. How can you argue with that?
Ok, I’ll tell you how: TANSTAAFL. There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
Here’s a piece from the WaPo that describes the price of free money, and here’s a key tidbit:
“These two traits are now clashing head-on. The company is in talks with the Kennedy Center about renegotiating its contract; one option is that WNO and the Kennedy Center may merge. But there’s a hitch.
Most of WNO’s endowment derives from the sale of a building donated by Betty Brown Casey, the widow of Eugene B. Casey, one of the company’s major donors. And she has stipulated, several sources confirm, that if WNO ceases to be independent or if it merges with the Kennedy Center, those funds will automatically go to the Metropolitan Opera in New York.”
Bummer, eh? You want the money you need to survive or you want the freedom to do the right thing? There’s only one way to have both and that’s to earn your own way.
To be precise, I believe that all organizations should make funding their operations from sales and small donations their first business priority. People talk about the business model for the arts, but here’s what I think. Every organization should do whatever it takes to balance the books without major donors.
Don’t tell me it’s impossible. It may be difficult. It is difficult, but it’s only impossible if you’re committed to staying the same. Radical changes may be just enough to keep some businesses and organizations alive, but what’s the alternative? Oblivion or servitude.
I get this from personal experience. In the Internet business, lots of people take big money from venture capitalists, and that makes some things easier. But it also means you’ve got a business partner, and this partner has some weird proclivities. He (or she, but probably he) wants to make 10 dollars for every one he gives you, and to do that, you’re going to have to take some crazy chances. You’re also going to feel some pressure to help his other investments, whether it really makes sense or not. He doesn’t have bad intentions; he just doesn’t know.
We nee took any of that money, not that we had that option, starting a ticket selling business in the shadow of 9/11and in the middle of a pretty serious recession. It also meant no one got paid (and by no one, I really mean the founders, who were pretty much the only people working in the business for a long time.). It was nerve-wracking, and it was tough, but in a couple years, we built a business that worked, and grew it gradually. We learned what it took to deliver a formula that delivered something special to customers and paid its own bills, including giving us enough to pay some salaries and keep us focused full time.
And that’s really the magic point for an organization. When you can pay your own way, you can grow. You can take smart chances. And you can also breathe a little more easily, because that’s how people do their best work. When they’re proud of what they’re doing, but not just struggling to survive.
A constellation of small donors? Great. That’s akin to sales for a non-profit.
Big donors, though, aren’t donors. They’re co-owners, and unless you’re sure you’ll always see eye to eye, be prepared to do what it takes to please your business partner.
Or patiently fix your business model and always have the ability to do the right thing.
Sign up for the monthly Live 2.0 newsletter. Commentary, interviews and more from smart, provocative, opinionated leaders in the Live 2.0 revolution.
2012
2011
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
2010
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
2009
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
2008
December 2008
August 13th, 2010
And the punch line? “Met Opera on Verge of Funding Windfall” say the papers. With what golden handcuffs? That, they don’t say.
September 7th, 2010
Good commentary. I tend to agree.
December 6th, 2010
Incredible article. Did you read the associated piece in the Huffington Publish some time back? It seems that more and more mainstream media are paying consideration to this. I hope your website gets more and more subscribers as this problem will get more protection, because it is a great useful resource.
December 6th, 2010
This is really a great weblog publish with thanks for sharing this academic information.. I will go to your web site regularly for some latest publish.
December 6th, 2010
I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work.