The discussion of the Celebrity Marketing Guru Deathmatch happening between Chris Anderson and Malcolm Gladwell has made me think of something that I wanted to put out there.
(For a recap of this, check out my recent post which more or less explains it all.)
Let’s talk abou the Long Tail for our industry, live entertainment.
The Long Tail is the nearly unlimited catalog of small-demand items that, when delivered cheaply enough, can be a viable business model. The best example of this is probably iTunes.
In the old days, even a big record store like Tower would stock somewhere around the 2000 most popular albums. That seemed like a huge selection, but with the advent of the Internet, there almost literally became no limit to how many titles of books or CDs or whatever could be stocked.
On iTunes, specifically, the cost of ‘holding’ something in inventory is, well, pretty close to zero, and the cost of ‘delivering’ one mp3 to a paying customer is also pretty close to zero. That means that even if you sell just one copy of a given mp3 per month, it’s still profitable to have it in inventory, and if that happens across countless songs, well, it adds up to something good.
Now, I’m personally not privy to the iTunes data, but I’ve seen enough sales distribution reports to suspect that the top 2000 or 5000 or even 10,000 artists in the iTunes catalog outsell the rest combined and probably by a multiple of something. LIke I said, I’m not privy to that, but I’ve been to a few e-commerce rodeos in my time, so you can take or leave my intuition about iTunes.
What I can tell you, however, is that the Long Tail in live events is not nearly as long. There are three simple reasons:
1. Well, I just know it’s not. I do have the data on that, and while there’s robust demand for thousands and thousands of events, that’s all it is. Thousands. Maybe a ten of thousands or two. Not millions. Not even hundreds of thousands.
2. The ‘holding’ costs of inventory are high. In other words, you can’t just keep a show on hold until one person wants it. You have to perform it at a given time and place, and it precipitates fixed costs.
3. A single instance of demand is not enough. Not unless you have a very expensive ticket.
I do believe very strongly in the ‘medium-sized’ tail, though, which is to say that most people see live entertainment as a handful of concerts, pro sports, and maybe a Broadway show. But it’s much broader than that. In fact, it’s an ecosystem of very healthy niches, to which I wish more and more live entertainment entrepreneurs would apply their creativity and hard work.
Think of it this way: TV’s very business model is in question. Revenues are threatened, and the industry is in trouble. Music, too, so all the creative folks pouring their souls into those industries should consider live entertainment.
We need your drive and creativity. We need your vision, too because as great as live entertainment is, in order for it to fulfill its potential for truly leading the entertainment business, it needs to be better.
Sign up for the monthly Live 2.0 newsletter. Commentary, interviews and more from smart, provocative, opinionated leaders in the Live 2.0 revolution.
2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
2011
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
2010
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
2009
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
2008
December 2008